Suggs v. State

189 S.W. 266, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 1, 1916
DocketNo. 4273
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 S.W. 266 (Suggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suggs v. State, 189 S.W. 266, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404 (Tex. 1916).

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of vagrancy in the county court of Tarrant county, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, we must presume the court presented the law, and all the law, applicable to the evidence in his charge.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nami v. State
263 S.W. 595 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Whitehead v. State
196 S.W. 851 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 S.W. 266, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suggs-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.