Suggs v. State
189 S.W. 266, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of vagrancy in the county court of Tarrant county, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.
In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, we must presume the court presented the law, and all the law, applicable to the evidence in his charge.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suggs v. State, 189 S.W. 266, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404 (Tex. 1916).
189 S.W. 266 (Suggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nami v. State
263 S.W. 595 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Whitehead v. State
196 S.W. 851 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)