Suggs v. State
72 S.E. 287, 9 Ga. App. 830, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 362
Opinion
1. The' evidence is sufficient to authorize the conviction.
2. In the absence of written request, it is not reversible error for the court to fail to charge on the subject of impeachment of witnesses.
3. Where the question as to whether a person was or was not - drunk at sundown on a given day was in issue, it was not error to admit testimony that he “seemed to be drinking” at about half past 2 o’clock that afternoon. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suggs v. State, 72 S.E. 287, 9 Ga. App. 830, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
72 S.E. 287 (Suggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sammons v. Webb
71 S.E.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Shropshire v. State
83 S.E. 152 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)