Suggs v. Hopper

233 S.E.2d 33, 141 Ga. App. 174, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1819
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 2, 1977·No. 53202·Published

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this trover suit against the warden of the state prison and two of his subordinates, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm. The evidence of defendants, which was not disputed, established that they had not converted plaintiffs personalty. Conversion is an essential element for recovery in trover. Wood v. Frank Graham Co., 91 Ga. App. 621 (86 SE2d 691); Cooper v. Ricketts, 135 Ga. App. 346 (217 SE2d 503).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur. Steve B. Suggs, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Isaac Byrd, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Suggs v. Hopper, 233 S.E.2d 33, 141 Ga. App. 174, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

233 S.E.2d 33 (Suggs v. Hopper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. FRANK GRAHAM COMPANY
86 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Cooper v. Ricketts
217 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)