Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Suggs v. Hopper

Suggs v. Hopper

233 S.E.2d 33, 141 Ga. App. 174, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1819
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 1977
Docket53202
StatusPublished

This text of 233 S.E.2d 33 (Suggs v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suggs v. Hopper, 233 S.E.2d 33, 141 Ga. App. 174, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this trover suit against the warden of the state prison and two of his subordinates, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm. The evidence of defendants, which was not disputed, established that they had not converted plaintiffs personalty. Conversion is an essential element for recovery in trover. Wood v. Frank Graham Co., 91 Ga. App. 621 (86 SE2d 691); Cooper v. Ricketts, 135 Ga. App. 346 (217 SE2d 503).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur. Steve B. Suggs, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Isaac Byrd, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. FRANK GRAHAM COMPANY
86 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Cooper v. Ricketts
217 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 S.E.2d 33, 141 Ga. App. 174, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suggs-v-hopper-gactapp-1977.