Sugg v. Wandling

New York Court of Appeals

Sugg v. Wandling

166 N.E. 307, 250 N.Y. 517, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1005

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 31, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 N.E. 307 (Sugg v. Wandling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sugg v. Wandling, 166 N.E. 307, 250 N.Y. 517, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1005 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The findings of fact support the conclusions of law made at Special Term. There are no exceptions whatever to these findings or conclusions. There are no requests to find. There are no exceptions to the admission or rejection of evidence which deserve consideration. Under these circumstances we cannot consider the questions which the appellant seeks to raise before us.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI