Sugg v. Farm Home Savings Loan Ass'n.

1930 OK 416, 291 P. 513, 145 Okla. 159, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 191
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 16, 1930
Docket20742
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 1930 OK 416 (Sugg v. Farm Home Savings Loan Ass'n.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sugg v. Farm Home Savings Loan Ass'n., 1930 OK 416, 291 P. 513, 145 Okla. 159, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 191 (Okla. 1930).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Ponto-toc county rendered on the 1st day of March, 1929, in an action wherein plaintiff in error was defendant. A motion for new trial was overruled March 27, 1929. No order was made on that day or within 15 days thereafter extending the time in which to make and serve case-made, nor was any order so made until the 24th day of May,, 1929, long after the 15 days allowed by law in which to make and serve case-made had expired. The order of May 24, 1929, extending the time in which to make and serve case-made is void for the reason the trial court was without jurisdiction to make and enter the same. Shinn v. Oklahoma City Building & Loan Ass’n, 130 Okla. 173, 266 Pac. 435; Petty v. Foster, 122 Okla. 152, 252 Pac. 836; Bass v. Dowd, 81 Okla. 212, 197 Pac. 513; Tanner v. Crawford, 80 Okla. 183, 195 Pac. 138. The time in which to serve case-mad© expired April 11, 1929. Th© case-made was served on the defendant in error June 1,1929; therefore not with-, in the time allowed by law or valid order of the court, and is a nullity and brings nothing before this court for review. Petty v. Foster, supra; Harrison v. Reed, 81 Okla. 149, 197 Pac. 159; Shinn v. Oklahoma City Building & Loan Ass’n, supra. The record filed in this court is certified by the clerk as a transcript, but no bill of exceptions is incorporated therein, and the assignments of error in the petition in error are such as can only be reviewed upon bill of exceptions or case-made. For the reasons herein stated, the appeal is dismissed.

Note. — See under (1, 2) 2 R. O'. L. p. 158; R. O. L. Perm. Supp. p. 351.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
2015 OK 8 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2015)
Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
2013 OK 43 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2013)
Opinion No. (1986)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports, 1986
Thomas v. Cumberland Operating Co.
1977 OK 164 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1977)
Opinion No. 70-215 (1970) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports, 1970
Corn v. Shelton Equipment & Machine Co.
259 F. Supp. 955 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1966)
Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Naughton
1946 OK 273 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)
State v. Ward
1941 OK 343 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
Bigpond v. Mutaloke
1940 OK 165 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)
Washabaugh v. Bartlett Collins Glass Co.
1936 OK 294 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Swatek Construction Co. v. Williams
1935 OK 1139 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Campbell v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen
181 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1935)
Gajda v. Reick-McJunkin Dairy Co.
18 F.2d 279 (Sixth Circuit, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1930 OK 416, 291 P. 513, 145 Okla. 159, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sugg-v-farm-home-savings-loan-assn-okla-1930.