Sugg v. Eskew

196 F. 767, 117 C.C.A. 577, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1543
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 6, 1912·No. No. 3,658·Published

Opinion

CARLAND, Circuit Judge.

This is an action in ejectment for section 36, township 17, range 7, Dunklin county, .Mo., and for rents and profits. Our decision in No. 3,659, Byrd v. Hall and Decatur Egg Case Company et al., 196 Fed. 762, must rule this case. The judgment below is therefore reversed, and a new trial granted for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sugg v. Eskew, 196 F. 767, 117 C.C.A. 577, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1543 (8th Cir. 1912).

196 F. 767 (Sugg v. Eskew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrd v. Haul
196 F. 762 (Eighth Circuit, 1912)