Sugarman v. Goldberg
100 N.Y.S. 1012
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 14, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The surrender of the lease was from April 30th; the time for delivery of the deed, April 11th. Manifestly the lease was an incumbrance not provided for in the contract, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover. The case shows no prejudicial error.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sugarman v. Goldberg, 100 N.Y.S. 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
100 N.Y.S. 1012 (Sugarman v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haiss v. Schmukler
121 Misc. 574 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)