Sugarman v. Goldberg
100 N.Y.S. 1012
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 100 N.Y.S. 1012 (Sugarman v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sugarman v. Goldberg, 100 N.Y.S. 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
Opinion
The surrender of the lease was from April 30th; the time for delivery of the deed, April 11th. Manifestly the lease was an incumbrance not provided for in the contract, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover. The case shows no prejudicial error.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haiss v. Schmukler
121 Misc. 574 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 N.Y.S. 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sugarman-v-goldberg-nyappterm-1906.