Sugarman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
75 A.2d 822, 5 N.J. 382, 1950 N.J. LEXIS 361
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Grimshaw in the Superior Court, Chancery Division.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Yandbrbilt, and Justices • Case, Hei-ier, Olipj-iant, Wachenebld, Burling and Ackbrson—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sugarman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 75 A.2d 822, 5 N.J. 382, 1950 N.J. LEXIS 361 (N.J. 1950).
75 A.2d 822 (Sugarman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Goduti-Moore
36 F. Supp. 2d 657 (D. New Jersey, 1999)
McFarland v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance
93 A.2d 551 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1953)
Taub v. Taub
75 A.2d 822 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)