Sugarland Drainage District v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.

128 So. 27, 99 Fla. 932
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 27 (Sugarland Drainage District v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sugarland Drainage District v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co., 128 So. 27, 99 Fla. 932 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment to which writ of error is taken herein is affirmed upon authority of .City of Ocala, Florida, for the use and benefit of Standard Oil Company, v. Continental Casualty Company and Baker & Foulks, Inc., and Sugarland Drainage District Glades and Hendry Counties, Florida, for the use and benefit of Standard Oil Company, a Kentucky corporation, v. Elbridge D. Barr and Detroit Fidelity and Surety Company, a Michigan corporation, both decided at the present term.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 So. 27, 99 Fla. 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sugarland-drainage-district-v-detroit-fidelity-surety-co-fla-1930.