Sugarhouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 20, 2017
DocketSugarhouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd. - No. 124 EM 2016
StatusPublished

This text of Sugarhouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd. (Sugarhouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sugarhouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd., (Pa. 2017).

Opinion

[J-133-2016 and J-134-2016] [MO: Todd] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P., : No. 124 EM 2016

Petitioner : Appeal from the Supplemental : Adjudication of the Pennsylvania : Gaming Control Board in the matter of v. : the Applications for the Category 2 Slot : Machine License in the City of the First : Class, Philadelphia, dated June 23, PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL : 2016 BOARD, : SUBMITTED: November 7, 2016 Respondent

STADIUM CASINO, LLC,

Intervenor

MARKET EAST ASSOCIATES, LP, : No. 125 EM 2016

Petitioner : Appeal from the Supplemental : Adjudication of the Pennsylvania : Gaming Control Board in the matter of v. : the Applications for the Category 2 Slot : Machine License in the City of the First : Class, Philadelphia, dated June 23, PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL : 2016 BOARD, : SUBMITTED: November 7, 2016 Respondent

CONCURRING OPINION

JUSTICE BAER DECIDED: June 20, 2017 I join the majority opinion in substantial part, but I write separately to distance

myself from my colleagues' definition of "financial interest" for purposes of Section 1330

of the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act ("Gaming Act"), which

prohibits a "slot machine licensee, its affiliate, intermediary, subsidiary or holding

company" from "possess[ing] an ownership or financial interest that is greater than

33.3% of another slot machine licensee" or other related entities. 4 Pa.C.S. § 1330.1

14 Pa.C.S. § 1330, entitled "Multiple slot machine license prohibition," provides in full:

No slot machine licensee, its affiliate, intermediary, subsidiary or holding company may possess an ownership or financial interest that is greater than 33.3% of another slot machine licensee or person eligible to apply for a Category 1 license, its affiliate, intermediary, subsidiary or holding company. The board shall approve the terms and conditions of any divestiture under this section. Under no circumstances shall any such divestiture be approved by the board if the compensation for the divested interest in a person eligible to apply for a Category 1 license exceeds the greater of the original cost of the interest, the book value of the interest or an independently assessed value of the interest one month prior to the effective date of this part and, in the case of a person eligible to apply for a Category 1 license, unless the person acquiring the divested interest is required to continue conducting live racing at the location where live racing is currently being conducted in accordance with section 1303 (relating to additional Category 1 slot machine license requirements) and be approved for a Category 1 slot machine license. No such slot machine license applicant shall be issued a slot machine license until the applicant has completely divested its ownership or financial interest that is in excess of 33.3% in another slot machine licensee or person eligible to apply for a Category 1 license, its affiliate, intermediary, subsidiary or holding company.

[J-133-2016 and J-134-2016] [MO: Todd] - 2 Unlike the Majority Opinion, I view "financial interest" broadly to encompass ownership

interests. See Maj. Op. at 35 n.31.

As the Majority and the parties have observed, "financial interest" is not defined

in Section 1330. The term, however, is defined in Sections 1201 and 1512. While I

agree that the definitions in Section 1201 and 1512 are limited to those specific

sections, I find guidance in the definitions which substantially overlap with each other

and conform to a common understanding of the term "financial interest."

Section 1201 provides various restrictions on those who may serve on the

Gaming Control Board, including limiting a board member's "financial interest" in an

applicant or licensed facility. It defines "financial interest" as "[a]n ownership, property,

leasehold or other beneficial interest in an entity." 4 Pa.C.S. § 1201(n).2 It further

2 4 Pa.C.S. § 1201, entitled "Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board established," provides in relevant part:

As used in this section, the following words (n) Definitions. - and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection:

"Financial interest." An ownership, property, leasehold or other beneficial interest in an entity. The term shall not include an interest which is held or deemed to be held in any of the following:

(1) Securities that are held in a pension plan, profit-sharing plan, individual retirement account, tax-sheltered annuity, a plan established pursuant to section 457 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Public Law 99-514, 26 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), or any successor provision, deferred compensation plan whether qualified or not qualified under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or any successor provision, or other retirement plan that:

(i) is not self -directed by the individual; and

(continued...)

[J-133-2016 and J-134-2016] [MO: Todd] - 3 explains that an "ownership interest," for purposes of the term's inclusion in financial

interest, encompasses "[o]wning or holding, or being deemed to hold, debt or equity

securities or other ownership interest or profit interest." Id. The subsection additionally

excludes from the term "financial interest" three categories of passive holdings,

including pension plans and individual retirement accounts, Section 529 tuition plans,

and mutual funds which are not self -directed. Notably, the Board adopted this definition

nearly verbatim in its regulation relevant to the Board's operations and organization. 58

Pa. Code § 403a.1.

Similarly, Section 1512 limits certain government -affiliated individuals from

having a financial interest in licensees or certain related entities. The section defines

"financial interest" in very similar terms to Section 1201's definition.3 As in Section

(... continued) (ii) is advised by an independent investment adviser who has sole authority to make investment decisions with respect to contributions made by the individual to these plans.

(2) A tuition account plan organized and operated pursuant to section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Public Law 99-514, 26 U.S.C. § 529) that is not self -directed by the individual.

(3) A mutual fund where the interest owned by the mutual fund in a licensed entity does not constitute a controlling interest as defined in this part.

"Ownership interest." Owning or holding, or being deemed to hold, debt or equity securities or other ownership interest or profit interest.

3 4 Pa.C.S. § 1512(b), entitled "Financial and employment interests," defines "financial interest" for purposes of the section as follows:

"Financial interest." Owning or holding, or being deemed to hold, debt or equity securities or other ownership interest or (continued...)

[J-133-2016 and J-134-2016] [MO: Todd] - 4 1201, financial interest for purposes of Section 1512 includes "[o]wning or holding, or

being deemed to hold, debt or equity securities or other ownership interest or profits

(... continued) profits interest. A financial interest shall not include any debt or equity security, or other ownership interest or profits interest, which is held or deemed to be held in any of the following:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tax imposed
26 U.S.C. § 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sugarhouse HSP Gaming, LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sugarhouse-hsp-gaming-lp-v-pa-g-c-bd-pa-2017.