Sugar v. State
This text of 655 So. 2d 1271 (Sugar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James Leonard SUGAR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Thomas Falkinburg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion filed in the trial court by appellant, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order denying that motion is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 So. 2d 1271, 1995 WL 331456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sugar-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.