Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sugar v. State

Sugar v. State

655 So. 2d 1271, 1995 WL 331456
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 1995·No. 94-3853·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

655 So.2d 1271 (1995)

James Leonard SUGAR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-3853.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 6, 1995.
Rehearing Denied June 29, 1995.

Appellant pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Thomas Falkinburg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion filed in the trial court by appellant, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order denying that motion is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sugar v. State, 655 So. 2d 1271, 1995 WL 331456 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 1271 (Sugar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stoutamire v. State
734 So. 2d 468 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Edwards v. State
700 So. 2d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
McNeil v. State
676 So. 2d 48 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)