Sugar v. Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District

Opinion

Case 7:18-cv-00067-VB Document 75 Filed 12/06/19 Page 1of1

Po Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP Richard L. Steer averaye2 | 1350 Broadwa 212-216-8070 Direct Dial pce New York, NY □ 0018 rsteer(@tarterkrinsky.com )yefellay | F 242.216.8001 ey Lee) wwwtarterkrinsky.com □□□ □ December 6, 2019 . □ Via ECF Dh

Hon. Vincent L. Briccetti \) /U-te United States Courthouse oe | foe Southern District of New York 300 Quarropas Street, Courtroom 620 White Plains, NY 10601 Re: Sugar v. Greenburgh Eleven Ynion Free School District, et al. Case No. 7:18-cv-00067-VB Dear Judge Briccetti: We represent defendants, Greenburgh leven Union Free School District and Elton Thompson (collectively “Defendants”), in the/above-referenced action. We write pursuant to your Honor’s Individual Practice Rules, to Aequest permission for leave to file a motion to enforce the settlement under seal, as per Your Honor’s directives in the October 17, 2019 Opinion and Order (ECF No. 73). IV Respectfully, s/ Richard L, Steer APPLICATION GRANTED: Defendants may conditionally file the motion under seal. However, defendants shall file, together with the motion, a supplemental letter in support of their request to seal, pursuant to Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006), setting forth why any portion of the motion should be sealed. At that time, the Court will decide if sealing is appropriate. If defendants fail to file a supplemental letter, the Court will order the Clerk to unseal the motion. The Clerk shall terminate the letter-motion. (Doc. #75). SO ORDERED: { Vincent L. Briccetti, U.S.D.J., 12/6/2019