Suffolk Sports Center, Inc. v. Belli Construction Corp.

241 A.D.2d 546, 664 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 28, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 546 (Suffolk Sports Center, Inc. v. Belli Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suffolk Sports Center, Inc. v. Belli Construction Corp., 241 A.D.2d 546, 664 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), entered July 29, 1996, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of punitive damages, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $100,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Having failed to take exception to the court’s charge on the ground that it was unconstitutional insofar as it gave the jury unlimited discretion in determining the amount of punitive damages, the defendants’ contention in this regard is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPLR 4110-b; De Long v County of Erie, 60 NY2d 296; Morrissey v City of New York, 221 AD2d 607; see also, Figueroa v Waldbaum’s Inc., 222 AD2d 483). In any event, the jury was properly instructed on the assessment of punitive damages (see, Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v Haslip, 499 US 1; PJI 2:278). Furthermore, under the circumstances of this case, the punitive award was not excessive [547]*547inasmuch as it “hearts] some reasonable relation to the harm done and the flagrancy of the conduct causing it” (Rupert v Sellers, 48 AD2d 265, 269; see, Suffolk Sports Ctr. v Belli Constr. Corp., 212 AD2d 241).

The defendants’ remaining contentions lack merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koch v. Greenberg
14 F. Supp. 3d 247 (S.D. New York, 2014)
D'Elia v. 58-35 Utopia Parkway Corp.
43 A.D.3d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Morris v. Flaig
511 F. Supp. 2d 282 (E.D. New York, 2007)
Handy v. Cohen
8 Misc. 3d 5 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Fareway Heights, Inc. v. Hillock
300 A.D.2d 1023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Grieco v. Galasso
297 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Greenbaum v. Handelsbanken
67 F. Supp. 2d 228 (S.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D.2d 546, 664 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suffolk-sports-center-inc-v-belli-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1997.