Suffolk Pines, Inc. v. Harwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Suffolk Pines, Inc. v. Harwood

10 A.D.2d 867, 199 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 10 A.D.2d 867 (Suffolk Pines, Inc. v. Harwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Suffolk Pines, Inc. v. Harwood, 10 A.D.2d 867, 199 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alla, to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Islip which had denied petitioner’s application for a permit to establish and operate a house trailer park, petitioner appeals (1) from an order, entered August 5,1958, dismissing his petition, and (2) from an order, entered July 1, 1959, denying reargument or leave to renew. Order dismissing petition unanimously affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to any action or proceeding which appellant might be advised to institute, based on the ground that the amendment to'the ordinance is unconstitutional, or that respondents willfully withheld the permit and misled and hindered appellant (see Matter of Dubow v. Ross, 254 App. Div. 706). The record at bar does not bring this ease within the rule of the Dubow ease. Nor is there any direct attack here on the constitutionality of the amendment, or facts in the record to support such attack. Appeal from order denying reargument or leave to renew, dismissed, without costs. Such order is not appealable. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ. [14 Misc 2d 826.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alla, to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Islip which had denied petitioner’s application for a permit to establish and operate a house trailer park, petitioner appeals (1) from an order, entered August 5,1958, dismissing his petition, and (2) from an order, entered July 1, 1959, denying reargument or leave to renew. Order dismissing petition unanimously affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to any action or proceeding which appellant might be advised to institute, based on the ground that the amendment to'the ordinance is unconstitutional, or that respondents willfully withheld the permit and misled and hindered appellant (see Matter of Dubow v. Ross, 254 App. Div. 706). The record at bar does not bring this ease within the rule of the Dubow ease. Nor is there any direct attack here on the constitutionality of the amendment, or facts in the record to support such attack. Appeal from order denying reargument or leave to renew, dismissed, without costs. Such order is not appealable. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ. [14 Misc 2d 826.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 867, 199 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suffolk-pines-inc-v-harwood-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack