Suffolk Family Equity Inc. v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Suffolk Family Equity Inc. v. County of Nassau

233 A.D.2d 436, 650 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11960

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for an illegal real property tax assessment, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), dated October 12, 1994, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint as time-barred. The essence of the plaintiffs’ claims are challenges to the denial, by the County of Nassau, of a real property tax exemption pursuant to RPTL 420-a, and the resultant assessment which required payment of property taxes. Accordingly, the appropriate Statute of Limitations is the four-month period applicable to CPLR article 78 proceedings (see, CPLR 217 [1]; Kahal Bnei Emunim & Talmud Torah Bnei Simon Israel v Town of Fallsburg, 78 NY2d 194; Matter of New Jersey Tr. Rail Operations v County of Rockland, 187 AD2d 430).

In light of the foregoing, we need not address the plaintiffs’ remaining contentions. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for an illegal real property tax assessment, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), dated October 12, 1994, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint as time-barred. The essence of the plaintiffs’ claims are challenges to the denial, by the County of Nassau, of a real property tax exemption pursuant to RPTL 420-a, and the resultant assessment which required payment of property taxes. Accordingly, the appropriate Statute of Limitations is the four-month period applicable to CPLR article 78 proceedings (see, CPLR 217 [1]; Kahal Bnei Emunim & Talmud Torah Bnei Simon Israel v Town of Fallsburg, 78 NY2d 194; Matter of New Jersey Tr. Rail Operations v County of Rockland, 187 AD2d 430).

In light of the foregoing, we need not address the plaintiffs’ remaining contentions. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Suffolk Family Equity Inc. v. County of Nassau, 233 A.D.2d 436, 650 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

233 A.D.2d 436 (Suffolk Family Equity Inc. v. County of Nassau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related