Suffolk County Police Department v. Gorman
This text of 202 A.D.2d 438 (Suffolk County Police Department v. Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding to quash a judicial subpoena, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated January 13, 1992, which denied the petition and directed the production of the subpoenaed items.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the subpoena is quashed.
The respondent’s purported need for the subpoenaed radar [439]*439equipment is for demonstrative purposes. The burden of compelling the county to produce the radar equipment far outweighs any asserted value that material could have to the respondent in the cross-examination of the police officer who charged the respondent with the traffic infraction (see, Matter of Constantine v Solomon, 194 AD2d 538).
Furthermore, based on the papers submitted herein, the respondent’s demand for training materials is no more than an attempt to circumvent the limits imposed upon proper discovery (see, Matter of Constantine v Solomon, supra). Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 438, 608 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suffolk-county-police-department-v-gorman-nyappdiv-1994.