Sue F. George v. New York Life Insurance Company, a Mutual Insurance Company

Ninth Circuit

Sue F. George v. New York Life Insurance Company, a Mutual Insurance Company

353 F.2d 738

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 20, 1965·No. 20067·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this action at law, tried to the court sitting without a jury, the district court made findings in favor of the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. Upon this appeal the contention is that the findings are clearly erroneous and that there was sufficient evidence to establish the claim of the plaintiff.

We have examined the record with care and the contentions of the appellant with respect thereto and we are forced to the conclusion that the findings are supported by the evidence, that they are not clearly erroneous, and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this action at law, tried to the court sitting without a jury, the district court made findings in favor of the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. Upon this appeal the contention is that the findings are clearly erroneous and that there was sufficient evidence to establish the claim of the plaintiff.

We have examined the record with care and the contentions of the appellant with respect thereto and we are forced to the conclusion that the findings are supported by the evidence, that they are not clearly erroneous, and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Sue F. George v. New York Life Insurance Company, a Mutual Insurance Company, 353 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

353 F.2d 738 (Sue F. George v. New York Life Insurance Company, a Mutual Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related