Sudowsky v. Sudowsky
This text of 2 N.J. Misc. 355 (Sudowsky v. Sudowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a case of exceptions from a master’s report in a divorce case.
The case was one of desertion by the husband against the wife. The husband and the wife were both on the witness-stand and they told entirely different stories, she accusing him of desertion and he insisting on his story of the desertion. The corroborating witnesses have no knowledge of the facts surrounding the actual desertion, and there is no corroboration whatever of the fact of the desertion.
i shall therefore advise that the exceptions be dismissed and that the resport of the special master be confirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.J. Misc. 355, 1924 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudowsky-v-sudowsky-njch-1924.