Sudol v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sudol v. State

29 So. 3d 1155, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1451, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 364

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 2010

Docket5D09-1295

StatusPublished

This text of 29 So. 3d 1155 (Sudol v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sudol v. State, 29 So. 3d 1155, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1451, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 364 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the appellant, Anthony Sudol, fashions this appeal as an appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court, it appears that Mr. Sudol is actually attempting to appeal an order under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) granting a motion for reduction and modification of a sentence. As such an order is not appealable, we dismiss this appeal. See Jackson v. State, 936 So.2d 775 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Hunker v. State, 397 So.2d 934 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Moreover, if this had been an appeal from a judgment and sentence, we would have affirmed inasmuch as the sentence issued conforms to the plea bargain and is legal.

DISMISSED.

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although the appellant, Anthony Sudol, fashions this appeal as an appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court, it appears that Mr. Sudol is actually attempting to appeal an order under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) granting a motion for reduction and modification of a sentence. As such an order is not appealable, we dismiss this appeal. See Jackson v. State, 936 So.2d 775 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Hunker v. State, 397 So.2d 934 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Moreover, if this had been an appeal from a judgment and sentence, we would have affirmed inasmuch as the sentence issued conforms to the plea bargain and is legal.

DISMISSED.

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 So. 3d 1155, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1451, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudol-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack