Sudol v. Gurtman
141 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 668, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 290
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme ■Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenuhard, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sudol v. Gurtman, 141 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 668, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1928).
141 A. 922 (Sudol v. Gurtman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.