Sudol v. Gurtman
141 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 668, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 290
This text of 141 A. 922 (Sudol v. Gurtman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sudol v. Gurtman, 141 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 668, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1928).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme ■Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenuhard, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
141 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 668, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudol-v-gurtman-nj-1928.