Sudnek v. Klein

705 N.E.2d 359, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1243
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 17, 1999
DocketNo. 97-2341
StatusPublished

This text of 705 N.E.2d 359 (Sudnek v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sudnek v. Klein, 705 N.E.2d 359, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1243 (Ohio 1999).

Opinions

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poindexter v. First National Bank of Winston-Salem
92 S.E.2d 773 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
In Re Estate of Kurkowski
409 A.2d 357 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 N.E.2d 359, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudnek-v-klein-ohio-1999.