Sudnek v. Klein

705 N.E.2d 359, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1243
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1999·No. No. 97-2341·Published

Opinions

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sudnek v. Klein, 705 N.E.2d 359, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1243 (Ohio 1999).

705 N.E.2d 359 (Sudnek v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poindexter v. First National Bank of Winston-Salem
92 S.E.2d 773 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
In Re Estate of Kurkowski
409 A.2d 357 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)