Sudlow v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Sudlow v. State

130 N.E. 429, 75 Ind. App. 292, 1921 Ind. App. LEXIS 267

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 1921

DocketNo. 10,691

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 130 N.E. 429 (Sudlow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sudlow v. State, 130 N.E. 429, 75 Ind. App. 292, 1921 Ind. App. LEXIS 267 (Ind. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Dausman, P. J.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of having encouraged a female under the age of eighteen years “to be guilty of indecent and immoral conduct,” in violation of the act concerning delinquency in children. Acts 1917 p. 342, §1648 Burns’ Supp. 1918. The trial was by the court without a jury. We have examined the evidence and we find that it wholly fails to support the finding. Robinson v. State (1919), 188 Ind. 467, 124 N. E. 489. The judgment is reversed, and, in accordance with §2225 Burns 1914, §1895 R. S. 1881, the trial court is directed to discharge the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dausman, P. J.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of having encouraged a female under the age of eighteen years “to be guilty of indecent and immoral conduct,” in violation of the act concerning delinquency in children. Acts 1917 p. 342, §1648 Burns’ Supp. 1918. The trial was by the court without a jury. We have examined the evidence and we find that it wholly fails to support the finding. Robinson v. State (1919), 188 Ind. 467, 124 N. E. 489. The judgment is reversed, and, in accordance with §2225 Burns 1914, §1895 R. S. 1881, the trial court is directed to discharge the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 N.E. 429, 75 Ind. App. 292, 1921 Ind. App. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudlow-v-state-indctapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack