Suder v. Department of Corrections
This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 258 (Suder v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted to the Court upon the pleadings from which it appears: that West Virginia and Ohio are parties to a compact concerning probationers and parolees entered into by West Virginia pursuant to West Virginia Code §28-6-1, and by Ohio pursuant to Ohio Revised Code §5149.17; that a person who had been paroled from an Ohio penitentiary was arrested, pursuant to that compact, by the Sheriff of Upshur County, West Virginia, on August 30, 1977, and was held in the Upshur County Jail from that date until October 4, 1977; and that the Sheriff of Upshur County incurred expenses in the amount of $285.25, incident to maintenance of the prisoner during that period, which amount he seeks to recover.
West Virginia Code §62-12-19 provides, in part, that the costs of confining a paroled prisoner shall be paid out of the funds appropriated for the penitentiary from which he was paroled. Since the prisoner in question was not paroled from a West Virginia penitentiary, that statute implicitly requires a denial of this claim.
Of course, the claim is meritorious and it might be prosecuted successfully in the Ohio Court of Claims.
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Ct. Cl. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suder-v-department-of-corrections-wvctcl-1980.