Sudduth v. Sudduth
60 Miss. 366
This text of 60 Miss. 366 (Sudduth v. Sudduth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sudduth v. Sudduth, 60 Miss. 366 (Mich. 1882).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
By the conveyance to the trustee there was limited a use to Sarah B. Sudduth and the heirs of her body, to be begotten by her then husband, the grantor. This, under the statute de donis, would have been a fee tail, and by our statute is converted into a fee simple. McKenzie v. Jones, 39 Miss. 360.
The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Liberty Bank v. Wilson
77 So. 145 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Wallace v. Wallace
75 So. 449 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 Miss. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudduth-v-sudduth-miss-1882.