Sudduth v. Sudduth

60 Miss. 366
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

By the conveyance to the trustee there was limited a use to Sarah B. Sudduth and the heirs of her body, to be begotten by her then husband, the grantor. This, under the statute de donis, would have been a fee tail, and by our statute is converted into a fee simple. McKenzie v. Jones, 39 Miss. 360.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sudduth v. Sudduth, 60 Miss. 366 (Mich. 1882).

60 Miss. 366 (Sudduth v. Sudduth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liberty Bank v. Wilson
77 So. 145 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Wallace v. Wallace
75 So. 449 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)