Suddreth v. State
325 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15265
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 1976·No. No. X-135·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We have carefully considered the briefs, record and oral arguments and find no error in the rulings of the trial court with' the exception that appellant was sentenced without having been given psychiatric examinations as required by Section 801.051, Florida Statutes. See Wolf v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 282 So.2d 668. The sentence imposed upon appellant is, therefore, vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for compliance with said statute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suddreth v. State, 325 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).
325 So. 2d 458 (Suddreth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. State
345 So. 2d 778 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)