Suddreth v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Suddreth v. State

325 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15265

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 16, 1976

DocketNo. X-135

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 325 So. 2d 458 (Suddreth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Suddreth v. State, 325 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the briefs, record and oral arguments and find no error in the rulings of the trial court with' the exception that appellant was sentenced without having been given psychiatric examinations as required by Section 801.051, Florida Statutes. See Wolf v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 282 So.2d 668. The sentence imposed upon appellant is, therefore, vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for compliance with said statute.

McCORD, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the briefs, record and oral arguments and find no error in the rulings of the trial court with' the exception that appellant was sentenced without having been given psychiatric examinations as required by Section 801.051, Florida Statutes. See Wolf v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 282 So.2d 668. The sentence imposed upon appellant is, therefore, vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for compliance with said statute.

McCORD, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suddreth-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack