Sudbury v. Merchantville Building & Loan Ass'n

45 A. 1092, 57 N.J. Eq. 342, 12 Dickinson 342, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 77
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 11, 1897·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syqkel, Adams, Hendrickson, Vredenburgh — '8. For reversal — Collins, Dixon, Bogert, Nixon — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sudbury v. Merchantville Building & Loan Ass'n, 45 A. 1092, 57 N.J. Eq. 342, 12 Dickinson 342, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 77 (N.J. 1897).

45 A. 1092 (Sudbury v. Merchantville Building & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norris v. Pellinger
31 A.2d 398 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Pitman Building and Loan Asso. v. Wright
149 A. 820 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Schaefer v. Metzger
147 A. 774 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)