Sudbury

1 Rep. Cont. El. 81
CourtMassachusetts House of Representatives
DecidedJuly 1, 1811
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Rep. Cont. El. 81 (Sudbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts House of Representatives primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sudbury, 1 Rep. Cont. El. 81 (Mass. Super. Ct. 1811).

Opinion

The election of the members chosen, one of whom only was returned, from the town of Sudbury, was controverted by Ebenezer Plympton and others, on the ground, that said town was not entitled, by the number of ratable polls therein, to more than one representative.

The committee on elections reported, “ that the petition admits the right of the town of Sudbury to send one representative, and it appearing, by the return from said town, that one representative only is returned, the committee therefore [82]*82report, that the right of William Hunt, the member returned from said town, to a seat in this house, is unaffected by the facts stated in the petition.” The report was agreed to.1

[It does not appear whether the members were elected at the same balloting or separately.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Rep. Cont. El. 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudbury-masshserep-1811.