Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Sudan v. State

Sudan v. State

128 S.E. 692, 34 Ga. App. 146, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 87
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1925·No. 16387·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

In this State there are no accessories in misdemeanor eases, but each person who knowingly participates in a criminal act [147] which is a misdemeanor is guilty as a principal. Littlefield v. State, 22 Ga. App. 782 (1) (97 S. E. 259). - There is some evidence which would authorize the jury to reach the conclusion that the accused was aiding and abetting another who was violating the law which prohibits a person from having, controlling and possessing intoxicating liquor. Hanson v. State, 32 Ga. App. 58 (122 S. E. 629); Rogers v. State, 101 Ga. 562 (28 S. E. 978). The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided June 9, 1925. Arthur W. Powell, for plaintiff in error. John 8. Wood, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sudan v. State, 128 S.E. 692, 34 Ga. App. 146, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 87 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

128 S.E. 692 (Sudan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. State
28 S.E. 978 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Littlefield v. State
97 S.E. 259 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hanson v. State
122 S.E. 629 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)