Sudan v. State
This text of 128 S.E. 692 (Sudan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this State there are no accessories in misdemeanor eases, but each person who knowingly participates in a criminal act [147]*147which is a misdemeanor is guilty as a principal. Littlefield v. State, 22 Ga. App. 782 (1) (97 S. E. 259). - There is some evidence which would authorize the jury to reach the conclusion that the accused was aiding and abetting another who was violating the law which prohibits a person from having, controlling and possessing intoxicating liquor. Hanson v. State, 32 Ga. App. 58 (122 S. E. 629); Rogers v. State, 101 Ga. 562 (28 S. E. 978). The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 S.E. 692, 34 Ga. App. 146, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudan-v-state-gactapp-1925.