Sudakin v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sudakin v. Long Island Rail Road

32 A.D.2d 560, 300 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4190

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 560 (Sudakin v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sudakin v. Long Island Rail Road, 32 A.D.2d 560, 300 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages inter alia for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 24, 1968, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a late notice of claim and to serve an amended complaint. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied. Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of subdivision 1 of section 1276 of the Public Authorities Law and section 50-e of the General Municipal Law (Conroy v. Long Is. R. R., 31 A D 2d 834). They further failed to commence this action with the one-year limitation of time (Public Authorities Law, § 1276, subd. 2; Matter of Martin v. School Bd. of Union Free Dist. No. 28, Long Beach, 301 N. Y. 233). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages inter alia for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 24, 1968, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a late notice of claim and to serve an amended complaint. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied. Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of subdivision 1 of section 1276 of the Public Authorities Law and section 50-e of the General Municipal Law (Conroy v. Long Is. R. R., 31 A D 2d 834). They further failed to commence this action with the one-year limitation of time (Public Authorities Law, § 1276, subd. 2; Matter of Martin v. School Bd. of Union Free Dist. No. 28, Long Beach, 301 N. Y. 233). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 560, 300 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sudakin-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack