Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.

40 A.D.2d 666, 336 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 666 (Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co., 40 A.D.2d 666, 336 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Actions.)—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 6, 1972, unanimously modified, on ihe law and the facts and the consent of the plaintiff-respondent, to the extent of directing John McGovern to submit to pretrial examination for the purpose of identifying the inspections referred to in the letter of August 3, 1966, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, without prejudice to the rights of defendant-appellant to apply for further disclosure at a later date and'upon an appropriate presentation of additional matter elicited at the examination before trial. Concur — Markewieh, J. P., Kupferman, McNally, Steuer and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Actions.)—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 6, 1972, unanimously modified, on ihe law and the facts and the consent of the plaintiff-respondent, to the extent of directing John McGovern to submit to pretrial examination for the purpose of identifying the inspections referred to in the letter of August 3, 1966, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, without prejudice to the rights of defendant-appellant to apply for further disclosure at a later date and'upon an appropriate presentation of additional matter elicited at the examination before trial. Concur — Markewieh, J. P., Kupferman, McNally, Steuer and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 666, 336 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sucrest-corp-v-fisher-governor-co-nyappdiv-1972.