Suckishvili v. Visiting Nurse Service

74 A.D.3d 433, 900 N.Y.S.2d 874
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 2010·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered October 6, 2009, which denied plaintiffs motion for consolidation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There are no questions of law or fact common to both the instant medical malpractice action and the action alleging negligence by the driver of a motor vehicle (see Cronin v Sordoni Skanska Constr. Corp., 36 AD3d 448 [2007]). In any event, since the medical malpractice action is still at the discovery stage and the negligence action is ready to be placed on the trial calendar, consolidation would result in undue delay in the resolution of the earlier action (see id.). Consolidation might also result in jury confusion and prejudice to defendants (see Addison v New [434] York Presbyt. Hosp. / Columbia Univ. Med. Ctr., 52 AD3d 269, 270 [2008]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Suckishvili v. Visiting Nurse Service, 74 A.D.3d 433, 900 N.Y.S.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

74 A.D.3d 433 (Suckishvili v. Visiting Nurse Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

3B Assoc. LLC v. Ecommission Solutions, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 02086 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Cromwell v. CRP 482 Riverdale Ave., LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 5137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)