Suckishvili v. Visiting Nurse Service
This text of 74 A.D.3d 433 (Suckishvili v. Visiting Nurse Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered October 6, 2009, which denied plaintiffs motion for consolidation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There are no questions of law or fact common to both the instant medical malpractice action and the action alleging negligence by the driver of a motor vehicle (see Cronin v Sordoni Skanska Constr. Corp., 36 AD3d 448 [2007]). In any event, since the medical malpractice action is still at the discovery stage and the negligence action is ready to be placed on the trial calendar, consolidation would result in undue delay in the resolution of the earlier action (see id.). Consolidation might also result in jury confusion and prejudice to defendants (see Addison v New [434]*434York Presbyt. Hosp. / Columbia Univ. Med. Ctr., 52 AD3d 269, 270 [2008]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 A.D.3d 433, 900 N.Y.S.2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suckishvili-v-visiting-nurse-service-nyappdiv-2010.