Suchar v. Rothenstein

109 N.Y.S. 1147
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 10, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 109 N.Y.S. 1147 (Suchar v. Rothenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suchar v. Rothenstein, 109 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The affidavits concerning the service of the summons are conflicting; but in view of all the circumstances, and particularly the fact that the note sued on has been destroyed through the instrumentality of plaintiff, we are not convinced that personal service of summons upon the defendant Smith was ever made. The judgment must be reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suchar-v-rothenstein-nyappterm-1908.