Succession of Waterer

25 La. Ann. 210

Opinions

Taliaferro, J.

The appellee moves to dismiss this appeal.

First — Because the certificate is defective in not reciting that the-transcript contains “all the documents filed in the suit,’’ and that it contains “all the testimony adduced.”

Second — That the transcript is signed by the deputy clerk.

Third, — That the record of appeal was not brought up within tlieproper time after the order for a certiorari was issued.

Fourth — That appellant is without interest in the suit.

The transcript is certified to be “a true copy of all the proceedings had and of all the testimony taken on the trial,” etc. This suffices. 12 La. 476 ; 9 An. 95. The other grounds are without force. Motion overruled.