Succession of Waterer
This text of 25 La. Ann. 210 (Succession of Waterer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The appellee moves to dismiss this appeal.
First — Because the certificate is defective in not reciting that the-transcript contains “all the documents filed in the suit,’’ and that it contains “all the testimony adduced.”
Second — That the transcript is signed by the deputy clerk.
Third, — That the record of appeal was not brought up within tlieproper time after the order for a certiorari was issued.
Fourth — That appellant is without interest in the suit.
[211]*211The transcript is certified to be “a true copy of all the proceedings had and of all the testimony taken on the trial,” etc. This suffices. 12 La. 476 ; 9 An. 95. The other grounds are without force. Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 La. Ann. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-waterer-la-1873.