Succession of Taylor
This text of 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 21 (Succession of Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was decided by a decree rendered on April 5th, 1875.
A rehearing was prayed and granted, and another judgment rendered upon the rehearing on April 10th, 1876.
Another rehearing is now asked. This is an innovation upon the established practice of this court, and is not warranted by the Code. The applicant for the present rehearing quotes Arts. 911-3 of the code of Practice in justification. These are the articles which provide for the rehearing in the first instance. If they are to be extended so as to embrace a second, the same reasoning will extend them to a third and a fourth, and so on ad inifinitwm. Obviously the only limit to the duration of a suit under that construction, would be the pertinacity of the applicants who have been defeated by the last judgment.
The application is refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-taylor-la-1880.