Succession of Stuckey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Succession of Stuckey

560 So. 2d 114, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 874, 1990 WL 47903

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 18, 1990·No. No. 88-1351·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FORET, Judge.

This case was consolidated with the case of Talley v. Stuckey, 560 So.2d 111 (La.App. 3 Cir.1990). For the reasons assigned in our disposition of that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All costs of this appeal are taxed to the estates of Ceola Stuckey and James Merkel Stuckey and Estelle Rouly, in her capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Ceola Merkel [115] Stuckey and as the duly qualified Adminis-tratrix of the Estate of James Merkel Stuckey.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FORET, Judge.

This case was consolidated with the case of Talley v. Stuckey, 560 So.2d 111 (La.App. 3 Cir.1990). For the reasons assigned in our disposition of that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All costs of this appeal are taxed to the estates of Ceola Stuckey and James Merkel Stuckey and Estelle Rouly, in her capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Ceola Merkel [115] Stuckey and as the duly qualified Adminis-tratrix of the Estate of James Merkel Stuckey.

AFFIRMED.

Succession of Stuckey, 560 So. 2d 114, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 874, 1990 WL 47903 (La. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

560 So. 2d 114 (Succession of Stuckey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related