Succession of Stuckey

560 So. 2d 114, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 874, 1990 WL 47903
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 18, 1990
DocketNo. 88-1351
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 560 So. 2d 114 (Succession of Stuckey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Stuckey, 560 So. 2d 114, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 874, 1990 WL 47903 (La. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

FORET, Judge.

This case was consolidated with the case of Talley v. Stuckey, 560 So.2d 111 (La.App. 3 Cir.1990). For the reasons assigned in our disposition of that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All costs of this appeal are taxed to the estates of Ceola Stuckey and James Merkel Stuckey and Estelle Rouly, in her capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Ceola Merkel [115]*115Stuckey and as the duly qualified Adminis-tratrix of the Estate of James Merkel Stuckey.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Talley v. Stuckey
565 So. 2d 458 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)
Talley v. Stuckey
560 So. 2d 111 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 So. 2d 114, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 874, 1990 WL 47903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-stuckey-lactapp-1990.