Succession of Stuart
This text of 21 So. 29 (Succession of Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
H. Abes and Mrs. Funnell filed oppositions to the account of the executor. They appealed from adverse judgments.
The motion to dismiss is on the ground that the transcript is incomplete and the fault is imputable to the appellants. There is an affidavit in the record made by counsel for Abes, that the documents not found in the transcript were never filed, and form no part of the record. One of the documents has reference, exclusively to the opposition of Abes. Without this document he can obtain no reversal of the judgment, if it would bring about such a result. He is in the record with only his opposition. But the record is complete, and the clerk’s certificate sufficient.
The failure to file in evidence the judgment of Abes can not affect the appeal of Mrs. Funnell.
The motion to dismiss is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 So. 29, 48 La. Ann. 1484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-stuart-la-1896.