Succession of St. Dizier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of St. Dizier

61 So. 727, 132 La. 657, 1913 La. LEXIS 1918

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 31, 1913

DocketNo.. 19,429

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 So. 727 (Succession of St. Dizier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of St. Dizier, 61 So. 727, 132 La. 657, 1913 La. LEXIS 1918 (La. 1913).

Pincite

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss.

BREAUX, C. J.

[1] There are pleadings and testimony missing from the transcript. On that ground, counsel for the appellee has filed a motion asking that the appeal be dismissed.

The motion was filed over three days after the transcript was filed, and over three days after the first motion was made to fix the case for hearing.

The appeal might be dismissed if the transcript be so entirely defective as to amount [660]*660to an impossibility to decide the issues of the case, but not on appellee’s motion, not timely filed.

The motion to dismiss is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI