Succession of Schmidt

16 La. Ann. 256
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1861
StatusPublished

This text of 16 La. Ann. 256 (Succession of Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Schmidt, 16 La. Ann. 256 (La. 1861).

Opinion

Duffel, J.

This is an appeal, by the administrator of the succession of R. L. Schmidt, from a judgment homologating a provisional account rendered by said administrator.

[257]*257The counsel of the administrator complains, in his brief, of the rejection by the District Court, 1st. Of the claim of John B. Patterson, as bookkeeper employed by the administrator, to draw up the accounts due to the deceased. 2d. Of the claim of E. A. Arceneaux, for collections made at the instance of the administrator.

We concede, in proper cases, the right and propriety of an administrator, to employ such agents, and to pay to them a reasonable remuneration out of the assets of the succession, but the evidence adduced is wholly insufficient to show, in this particular case, the necessity of employing a book-keeper and a collector, and we have no evidence of the value of their services, and we may add, none that the services were rendered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 La. Ann. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-schmidt-la-1861.