Succession of Plauche

2 La. Ann. 575
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 2 La. Ann. 575 (Succession of Plauche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Plauche, 2 La. Ann. 575 (La. 1847).

Opinion

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Rost, J.

Marie Anne Marchand, wife of J. B. B. Planché, died, leaving all her property to her two sons by a former marriage. She appointed one of them the executor of her will; the other resides in Prance, and is represented in the succession by Plonoré JDoussan, his special attorney in fact. The succession is composed of paraphernal property, and of one-half of the property of the community which existed between the deceased and her lasthusband. The executor caused an inventory of both to be made in due time, and entered into the possession of the paraphernal property, leaving that of the community in the possession of the husband. A few days after the inventory had been ro[576]*576turned into court, the executor filed a provisional account of the claims presented against the succession, some of which were not admitted by him, on the ground that they Were community debts for which the husband alone was responsible, that he, the executor, had not taken possession of the property of the cpmtnunity, and that community debts could not be recovered out of the paraphernal estate of the testatrix.

In the petition to, which the account is annexed, the executor states his object to be, to ascertain the course to be pursued by him in his future administration of the succession; and to enable its creditors to establish any just claims they may have. The claims rejected were those of the physician and of the nurse, who attended the deceased during her last illness. These two creditors filed oppositions to the account, and those oppositions having been sustained, for the whole amount of the claims, the executor appealed.

The filing of the account by the executor, so short a time after the death of the testatrix, before he and his brother had either accepted er renounced the community, and before the term for deliberating had expired, was a premature «proceeding. The fact that the husband- continues in possession of the community property, does not, until the heirs renounce, affect their title to one half of it.

The acceptance or renunciation of the community by the heirs of the wife, are subject to the rules provided by law for the acceptance or renunciation of successions under the benefit of inventory; and the rights and powers of creditors are the same in both cases. C. C. art, 2383. They may', in either case, institute suits against the legal representative of the succession, or make opposition to the account he renders. If they do so, on the exception being made by the executor or administrator, that the heir is within the time for deliberating whether he will accept the succession or the community, as the case may be, the proceedings are stayed until the expiration of the term, and untij the heir has decided. C, C. art. 1046. This exception has not been taken in this case, either in writing or in argument, and we are bound to proceed, and decide on the rights of the opposing creditors. The amounts claimed by them appear to us high, very high. But the evidence in relation to- the value of the services, based upon the revolting nature of the decease, and the faithfulness with which they were rendered, is positive and stands uncoutrad-icted. It satisfied the judge of the court below, and there is nothing in the record which can authorise us to interfere with that portion of the judgment. He erred, however, in allowing the whole amount of these two claims ; they are community debts, for one half of which only, the succession of the wife is liable.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment in this case be amended; that the opponent, Honoré Houssan, be placed on the account as a privileged creditor for the sum of $217 50; and that the opponent, Magddaine Planché, be placed on the account as a privileged creditor, for the sum of $170. It is further ordered, that the judgment so amended be affirmed ; the succession paying, the costs of the District Court; those of this appeal to be paid in equal shares by the two opponents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 La. Ann. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-plauche-la-1847.