Succession of Payne

32 La. Ann. 355
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1880
DocketNo. 7807
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 La. Ann. 355 (Succession of Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Payne, 32 La. Ann. 355 (La. 1880).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Spencer, J.

D. C. Hardee, executor of said succession, rendered [356]*356bis final account thereof, which was duly advertised and homologated by the parish court. The tutor of the minor heirs of Payne appeals, and urges the nullity of the judgment of homologation, for the reason that the judge of the parish court who homologated the account was himself put down thereon as a creditor for one hundred dollars, and was, therefore, incompetent to try the case. Such is the fact, and the judgment must be annulled. See succession of S. O. Rhea, 31 A. 323.

It is therefore decreed that the judgment appealed from be annulled, and this cause is remanded to the court a qua, to be proceeded with according to law. Appellee paying costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Regents of the University v. Turner
114 P. 842 (California Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 La. Ann. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-payne-la-1880.