Succession of Ogea
This text of 609 So. 2d 244 (Succession of Ogea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application is granted.
The stay order previously issued by this court is recalled, and the case is remanded to the trial court to determine whether there is a usufruct in favor of Inita Joy Fontenot Ogea Oelhafen pursuant to the will that is awaiting probate. If the trial court determines that there is an existing usufruct conferred by the will, then the issue raised in the present application will become moot. However, if the trial court determines that the usufruct terminated upon Inita Joy Fontenot Ogea Oelhafen’s remarriage, then relator may reassert to the court of appeal the issue raised in the present application. In the meantime the trial court’s interim order allowing joint use of the premises is reinstated and will remain in effect until the ruling on the existence of the usufruct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
609 So. 2d 244, 1992 La. LEXIS 3848, 1992 WL 382157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-ogea-la-1992.