Succession of Norton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Norton

345 So. 2d 55, 1977 La. LEXIS 5262

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 4, 1977

DocketNo. 59626

StatusPublished

This text of 345 So. 2d 55 (Succession of Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of Norton, 345 So. 2d 55, 1977 La. LEXIS 5262 (La. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Commercial National Bank in Shreveport, etc., et al., applying for writ of certiorari or review.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Gayle K. Hamilton, Judge of the First Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Caddo, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 25th day of May, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 6th day of September, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Commercial National Bank in Shreveport, etc., et al., applying for writ of certiorari or review.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Gayle K. Hamilton, Judge of the First Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Caddo, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 25th day of May, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 6th day of September, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 55, 1977 La. LEXIS 5262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-norton-la-1977.