Succession of Morgan

347 So. 2d 315, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4176
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 7, 1977
DocketNo. 8167
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 347 So. 2d 315 (Succession of Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Morgan, 347 So. 2d 315, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4176 (La. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

SAMUEL, Judge.

The executor of this succession was desirous of selling certain immovable succession property on St. Ann Street in the City of New Orleans at private sale. After more than a year the highest bid he received therefor was $28,000 (the property had been [316]*316appraised at $26,000). The executor accepted that bid and in due course applied to the court for authority to sell. Subsequent to the acceptance of the $28,000 offer Walter R. Chevalier, Jr., through his attorney, offered to purchase the property for $30,000. Notice of the application to sell at private sale was published on January 31, and February 21, 1976. On February 26, 1976 Chevalier filed an opposition to the sale, to which the executor filed an exception of no right of action.

Following a hearing on Chevalier’s rule to show cause why the property should not be sold to him at the offered price of $30,-000, at which hearing the trial judge found good faith on the part of both litigants, there was judgment maintaining the exception and dismissing the opposition. Chevalier has appealed from that judgment.

The basis for the judgment appealed from is Code of Civil Procedure Article 32831 which reads:

“An opposition to a proposed private sale of succession property may be filed only by an heir, legatee, or creditor.” LSA-C.C.P. Art. 3283.

In this case Chevalier concedes he is not an heir, legatee or creditor; he is simply a third party bidder for the property. Under the above quoted Article 3283, it is clear he has no right to oppose the sale.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. McKee
363 So. 2d 1216 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
347 So. 2d 315, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-morgan-lactapp-1977.