Succession of McGee
This text of 91 So. 716 (Succession of McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rush Wimberly addressed a petition to the district court for the parish of Claiborne, alleging that he is district attorney for the Third judicial district, of which Claiborne forms a part; and alleging further that Isom McGee died intestate in 1897, leaving his widow, in community, Lona McGee, and an only child, Mattie McGee; that Mattie McGee died intestate and. without descendants in 1903, leaving as her sole and only heir at law her mother, Lona McGee; that Lona McGee died intestate about the year 1905, leaving property consisting of lands in the proven oil field of Claiborne parish, and that her succession is a vacant one, the heirs being [227]*227unknown. He alleges an administration of the vacant estate of Lona McGee is necessary, that he should be appointed curator thereof to administer it, and prays that letters of curatorship issue to him accordingly. Without alleging any necessity therefor, he also prays that letters of curatorship also issue to him to administer the estates of Isom MeGée and Mattie McGee.
Lillie G. Taylor filed an opposition to the ’ application of Wimberly, in which she denies that the succession of Lona McGee is vacant, and in which she avers that she is the duly acknowledged illegitimate daughter of Lona McGee, deceased, and was recognized as such, and as the sole heir of her mother, and put in possession of her mother’s estate, by the district court of Claiborne parish, in the suit of Lillie G. Taylor v. Angeline Allen; and therefore that there is no vacant estate to administer.
The state of Louisiana also filed an opposition to Wimberly’s application; but, because of the conclusion we have reached, it is unnecessary to state its grounds.
In the lower court, judgment was rendered rejecting the application of Wimberly, and he has appealed.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, at appellant’^ costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 So. 716, 151 La. 225, 1922 La. LEXIS 2697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-mcgee-la-1922.