Succession of McCrindell
This text of 13 La. Ann. 231 (Succession of McCrindell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The dismissal of the appeal is moved, on the ground that all the parties in interest in the judgment, and particularly Charles Condert, are not made parties to the appeal.
Charles Condert is placed upon the tableau filed as a creditor for the sum of $824 14. The appellants in their opposition, “ oppose the claim of Charles Condert, because it is not supported by any legal evidence.”
The judgment overrules this opposition, and Condert is not made a party to the appeal taken from it.
Appellants have given a bond for one hundred dollars for a devolutive appeal in favor of the administratrix, but not in favor of said Condert, or any of the creditors of the succession.
Condert has an interest in maintaining the judgment. Succession of Ira Smith, 8 An. 57.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the appeal in this case be dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 La. Ann. 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-mccrindell-la-1858.