Succession of McCausland
This text of 21 La. Ann. 2 (Succession of McCausland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The administrator of this succession filed his final account- and tableau. An opposition was filed to the homologation thereof, and from- the judgment on the opposition this appeal has been taken.
The case is now presented on a motion to dismiss the appeal because all the creditors in the tableau are not made parties thereto, the appieal bond being in favor of only part of the creditors.
[3]*3Tbe creditors in tlie tableau, wbo make this motion are clearly interested in maintaining the judgment appealed from, and the bond is defective in not being in their favor also.
The motion to dismiss is well taken. (See the case of the succession of Jacob Weigel, lately decided, and the authorities there cited.)
It is therefore ordered that the judgment rendered by this court on fourth February, 1867, dismissing this appeal, remain undisturbed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 La. Ann. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-mccausland-la-1869.