Succession of Martel

263 So. 2d 729, 262 La. 472, 1972 La. LEXIS 5065
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 30, 1972·No. No. 52616·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. There is no simultaneous death under our law for dispositions mortis causa. Presumptions of law require that in every event the husband or the wife predeceases the other. The substitution of the executor in case the husband predeceased his wife; the testatrix, at least makes the testament ambiguous. In such a case we should look to intent and are required to construe for testacy. This testament can be construed to have validity. We should at least remand for extrinsic evidence of testamentary intent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Succession of Martel, 263 So. 2d 729, 262 La. 472, 1972 La. LEXIS 5065 (La. 1972).

263 So. 2d 729 (Succession of Martel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Succession of Henderson
191 So. 3d 9 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
Succession of Flowers
532 So. 2d 470 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)