Succession of Logan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Logan

4 La. Ann. 279

DecidedApril 15, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 4 La. Ann. 279 (Succession of Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of Logan, 4 La. Ann. 279 (La. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the court (King, J. absent,) was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

In this case the transcript not having been seasonably filed, and no application for time having been made, the motion to dimiss must prevail. It appears by the affidavit of the appellant’s counsel, that the omission was attributable to a mistake on his part. But this is not a ground for relief. See Ducournau v. Levistones, 2 An. 245; ante p. 30.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court (King, J. absent,) was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

In this case the transcript not having been seasonably filed, and no application for time having been made, the motion to dimiss must prevail. It appears by the affidavit of the appellant’s counsel, that the omission was attributable to a mistake on his part. But this is not a ground for relief. See Ducournau v. Levistones, 2 An. 245; ante p. 30.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 La. Ann. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-logan-la-1849.