Succession of Hinde

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Hinde

1 Rob. 271

DecidedJanuary 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Rob. 271 (Succession of Hinde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of Hinde, 1 Rob. 271 (La. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

Garland, J.

William Whittington and Louisa Anna Hinde, the executors of the last will and testament of the Rev. Peter Robert Venable Hinde, have applied to us for a rule on the judge of the Court of Probates for the parish of New Orleans, to show cause why a mandamus should not issue to compel him to receive and register, and order to be executed, the last will and testament of the aforesaid Peter R. V. Hinde. The judge showed the same cause as in the cases of Wedderburn, ante p. 283, and Farmer, ante p. 270, and the case is, in all material points, similar to them.. We therefore have come to the same conclusion.

Let the rule be made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garland, J.

William Whittington and Louisa Anna Hinde, the executors of the last will and testament of the Rev. Peter Robert Venable Hinde, have applied to us for a rule on the judge of the Court of Probates for the parish of New Orleans, to show cause why a mandamus should not issue to compel him to receive and register, and order to be executed, the last will and testament of the aforesaid Peter R. V. Hinde. The judge showed the same cause as in the cases of Wedderburn, ante p. 283, and Farmer, ante p. 270, and the case is, in all material points, similar to them.. We therefore have come to the same conclusion.

Let the rule be made absolute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Rob. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-hinde-la-1842.