Succession of Hearn
415 So. 2d 215
Opinion
SUCCESSION OF Archie G. HEARN.
Mallery Clotille Hearn MUSSELWHITE
v.
Mamie Slack HEARN, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied. Result is correct.
DIXON, C. J., and MARCUS, J., concur in the denial, La.App., 412 So.2d 692, being of the opinion that the 5 year prescription period began to run from the date of the judgment of possession (Feb. 13, 1975) but was interrupted by plaintiff's pleading filed in the succession proceedings on Nov. 23, 1979.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Succession of Hearn, 415 So. 2d 215 (La. 1982).
415 So. 2d 215 (Succession of Hearn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Biggs v. Hatter
91 So. 3d 1148 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
In Re Estate of Daniel
819 A.2d 968 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Valentine v. Elliott
819 A.2d 968 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Miller v. Succession of Cupples
535 So. 2d 1185 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
Sanders v. Rhodes
452 So. 2d 197 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
Succession of Mangle
452 So. 2d 197 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
Sutherland v. Time Saver Stores, Inc.
428 So. 2d 972 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
West v. Gajdzik
425 So. 2d 263 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1982)